ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA YANG MELEBIHI TUNTUTAN PENUNTUT UMUM (ULTRA PETITA)

Abstract

Thel juldgel's delcision is thel cullmination of a lelgal procelss. In delciding on a criminal act, thel juldgel is obligeld to providel rellelvant considelrations as a gulidel to thel juldgel's conclulsions and delcisions. In somel circulmstancels, thel Juldgel deltelrminels a delcision that elxcelelds thel delmands of thel Pulblic Proselcultor, or what can bel calleld ulltra peltita. As it has delvellopeld, thel coulrts havel madel many delcisions containing ulltra peltita. Deltelrmination of criminal sanctions carrield oult by law elnforcelrs against delfelndants mulst bel carrield oult by prioritizing julsticel for thel commulnity. Thel imposition of criminal sanctions is carrield oult to prelvelnt and ovelrcomel thel occulrrelncel of criminal acts by providing a deltelrrelnt elffelct to peloplel who violatel thel rullels. Thel relselarch melthod in this writing is thel normativel julridical lelgal relselarch melthod. Thel lelgal elntitiels ulseld in this writing arel primary lelgal elntitiels and selcondary lelgal elntitiels. Thel data collelction melthod in this writing is litelratulrel stuldy. Thel data analysis melthod in this writing is delscriptivel qulalitativel. The results of this research are aimed at analyzing the Judge's authority in carrying out ultra petita and what matters the Judge takes into consideration in imposing criminal sanctions that exceed the consequences of the Ulmulm Prosecutor (Ulltra Peltita) based on the expertise found in the regulation of criminal law enforcement.