THE SENTENCING EFFECTIVITY ON THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE OF CORRUPTION THROUGH THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: A REVIEW

Abstract

Corruption is an act of abusing the legally given power by an entitled public officer or a legal entity, at the length of acting outside from their official capacities that are within the legal duty, with the intention of taking advantage from the policy’s loopholes that are mainly regulating the act of conduct. Presently, corruption can be described as an act that are done by the person per se, not per the Actions solely, in which every Actions that ‘Actions’ outside of its formal domain of conduct, should be considered as a corruption. Many scholars condemn the act of corruption as a discourse of discrepancy throughout the form of interpersonal, social, moral, and legal order from its own. This study's methodology is the legal normative approach. This study's methodology, which employs this normative legal approach, is based on both a situational approach and a state law approach, adopting the literature study approach, which entails compiling information from a range of publications, including books, journals, websites, and online sources. Analysis in this study was based on information from sources about the laws and regulations that relate to the penalty of corruption offenses as observed in criminal law and state administrative law.